Mary Carpenter v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Case C-60/00)
[ send me this paper ]
This 4 page paper is an outline of the case of Mary Carpenter v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Case C-60/00). The writer outlines the facts and then looks at the decision made by the European Court. The bibliography cites 3 sources.
Filename: TEcarptr.rtf

Memo: Aggravated Menacing Case
[ send me this paper ]
10 pages in length. Was Jack Flemming's intent to hurt his girlfriend, Trish, or was he merely venting the frustration of his very first heartbreak? Regardless of his ultimate intent, if any, he still was responsible for placing the threatening words where they could be openly viewed, which gave sufficient cause for concern toward aggravated menacing, violating R.C. 2903.21(A). No bibliography.
Filename: TLClegal2.wps

Merge Case: A Legal Brief
[ send me this paper ]
A 2 page paper which presents a legal brief of the case concerning the Merge case. No additional sources cited.
Filename: RAlbmerge.wps

MIMA v Bhardwai: Australian Case Law
[ send me this paper ]
This 5 page paper outlines the case of the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (MIMA) v Bhardwai (2002), HCA 11 (14 March 2002). This paper outlines the basic elements of this case. Bibliography lists 4 sources.
Filename: MHBhardw.rtf

Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
[ send me this paper ]
A 1 page brief of the case involving the police detainment and questioning of four defendants without advising them of their right to silence or their right to an attorney. Determined that such interrogation did not adequately provide for the Fifth Amendment privilege against self incrimination, the “right to remain silent unless he chooses to speak in the unfettered exercise of his own will”. No additional sources are listed.
Filename: PPlawBr5.wps

Miranda v. Arizona (1966): Just in all Cases?
[ send me this paper ]
A 4 page exploration of this critical case. The author contends that the overall good that is accomplished by the Miranda requirement outweighs the fact that occasionally criminals escape prosecution because they were not read their rights at the time of apprehension and arrest. Bibliography lists 3 sources.
Filename: PPlwMir2.rtf

Modern Law and the Case of Ruxley Electronics;
[ send me this paper ]
This 6 page paper considers the case of Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v Forsyth in the context of its' precedent being representative of modern law. The case is examined in the context its' interpretation of the award of damages being granted in line with a pleasurable contract and limited in terms of the damages awarded despite the breach of express condition. The paper cites many cases to illustrate the points raised. The bibliography cites 10 sources.
Filename: TEruxley.wps

Monsanto Co. v. Coramandal Indag Products, (P) Ltd (Legal Brief)
[ send me this paper ]
This 4 page paper examines this international business case. Several sections make up this brief and provides details about the case and its relevance. Bibliography lists 4 sources.
Filename: SA537brf.rtf

Morgan’s Home v. Martucci, et al
[ send me this paper ]
A 5 page case summary of Morgan’s Home Equipment Corp. v. John Martucci, Harry Garber, Ray Convor and Dan Spiller and also Morris Spiller, individually and trading as Variety Sales Corp (390 Pa. 618, 136 A.2d 838). The writer summarizes the facts of the case, its legal history, the court holding, rational and disposition. No other sources cited.
Filename: khmvmar.rtf

Morse et. al. v Frederick: An Analysis
[ send me this paper ]
A 3 page review of this important Supreme Court case. This paper analyzes the case in comparison to past case law and suggests additional arguments as to why the findings of the Supreme Court were in fact just. Bibliography lists 3 sources.
Filename: PPlwMorseFrederick.rtf